<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" >

<channel><title><![CDATA[Steve McCardell - Blog]]></title><link><![CDATA[https://www.stevemccardell.com/blog]]></link><description><![CDATA[Blog]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2026 08:28:05 -0400</pubDate><generator>Weebly</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Wordle Strategy - First 2 Words to Choose for Your Daily Wordle]]></title><link><![CDATA[https://www.stevemccardell.com/blog/wordle-strategy-first-2-words-to-choose-for-your-daily-wordle]]></link><comments><![CDATA[https://www.stevemccardell.com/blog/wordle-strategy-first-2-words-to-choose-for-your-daily-wordle#comments]]></comments><pubDate>Sun, 13 Mar 2022 18:46:53 GMT</pubDate><category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.stevemccardell.com/blog/wordle-strategy-first-2-words-to-choose-for-your-daily-wordle</guid><description><![CDATA[If you enjoy Wordle and are looking for a good strategy to approach it, I'll share what I'm doing. I'm sure there are people with better success than I'm having, but my results feel pretty good:         The goal, of course, is to eliminate as many letters as possible in the first couple turns, minimizing the possible number of words in later turns. My approach is to:Usually check all the vowels in the first 2 turns, as this rapidly helps you diminish what words you can choose from.Check D, S, T, [...] ]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="paragraph" style="text-align:left;">If you enjoy Wordle and are looking for a good strategy to approach it, I'll share what I'm doing. I'm sure there are people with better success than I'm having, but my results feel pretty good:</div>  <div><div class="wsite-image wsite-image-border-none " style="padding-top:20px;padding-bottom:20px;margin-left:0px;margin-right:0px;text-align:center"> <a> <img src="https://www.stevemccardell.com/uploads/2/8/3/5/2835963/published/wordle-strategy.png?1647197315" alt="Wordle Strategy" style="width:auto;max-width:100%" /> </a> <div style="display:block;font-size:90%"></div> </div></div>  <div class="paragraph" style="text-align:left;">The goal, of course, is to eliminate as many letters as possible in the first couple turns, minimizing the possible number of words in later turns. My approach is to:<br /><br /><ul><li>Usually check all the vowels in the first 2 turns, as this rapidly helps you diminish what words you can choose from.</li><li>Check D, S, T, and L&nbsp;in the first two turns. This leaves only R and N unchecked in terms of the most used consonants. But I check the others because they let me move through all the vowels.</li></ul><br /><strong>First Guess: AUDIO</strong><br /><br />This immediately checks 4 vowels, and if I get at least 2 vowels, I usually move immediate into guessing words that include D, S, T, L, R, and N. This starts to find correct vowel positions on my second guess, and starts to eliminate top consonants.<br /><br />An intentional benefit to this word is putting U in the second position. If it appears&nbsp;<em>green</em>, meaning that it's in the right position, I'll guess a Q word as my second word, eliminating the chance that they're trying to catch me with an uncommon letter.<br /><br />For instance, if U is in the correct position and there are no other correct letters, I would guess "QUEST" -- this checks E, S, and T, which are all critical early guesses, and eliminates this chance of a Q word.<br /><br />If I get U in the correct spot and I or O are in the wrong spot, I might guess QUITE or QUOTE to again check on Q as well as other popular letters (T and E). Again, this also helps me find my vowel positions on turn #2 instead of having to wait for turn #3.<br /><br /><strong>Second Guess: STYLE</strong><br /><br />Again, I only make this my second guess if I got less than 2 vowels in my first guess. With this word, I check S, T, and L (all top consonants) along with checking the rest of the vowels. Notice that I guess this, even if one vowel and/or "D" were correct in the first turn because I'm not trying to place that vowel or the D yet. I'm just trying to find / eliminate critical letters.<br /><br />After this guess, I've gone through 10 of probably the 12 most important letters to check, with R and N being other highly used consonants. You can check those on turn #3 if they fit with what you've found in the first two turns. But often after going through these 10 letters shown above, you're well on your way to solving your daily Wordle.<br /><br /><strong>Another Approach:</strong><br />I've seen IRATE as another first turn move. It checks 5 of the top 6 most commonly used letters, including 3 vowels. I personally like to move through all the vowels. So if I were to start with IRATE, and didn't get at least 2 vowels from it, I would likely move onto LOUSY or YOUNG as my second guess. This would again eliminate all vowels while checking either L and S (the better option, I think; also puts Y in the last position, which might be useful, since Y often ends a word when used), or N and G.<br /><br />The only thing this approach doesn't do is address that sneaky possible Q word. You might find that U is in the word, but until you know whether it's the second letter, that sort of hangs out there. I also personally like checking D, as it's the 4th most common word ending, following E, S, and T. My approach checks all these letters in the first 2 turns.<br /><br />Hope this helps with your daily Wordle!</div>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[2021: Year of the New Dream]]></title><link><![CDATA[https://www.stevemccardell.com/blog/2021-year-of-the-new-dream]]></link><comments><![CDATA[https://www.stevemccardell.com/blog/2021-year-of-the-new-dream#comments]]></comments><pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2021 15:23:40 GMT</pubDate><category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.stevemccardell.com/blog/2021-year-of-the-new-dream</guid><description><![CDATA[A year ago, I posted a message about 2020 being the year for seeing clearly, as we use the term 20/20 to refer to good eyesight. I soon found many people were making the same reference. And boy did we ask for it.2020 opened people's eyes like never before. But with incredible division in&nbsp;how&nbsp;people see the world, either there are several realities going on at once (entirely possible), or different groups have gotten clearer about different&nbsp;things while still having the wool over t [...] ]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="paragraph" style="text-align:left;">A year ago, I posted a message about 2020 being the year for seeing clearly, as we use the term 20/20 to refer to good eyesight. I soon found many people were making the same reference. And boy did we ask for it.<br /><br />2020 opened people's eyes like never before. But with incredible division in&nbsp;<em>how</em>&nbsp;people see the world, either there are several realities going on at once (entirely possible), or different groups have gotten clearer about different&nbsp;things while still having the wool over their eyes about others. And yet the new level of clarity has made us more convinced about our "rightness" than ever, driving division to new levels.<br /><br />I think it's fair to say that most people are pointing to the top -- to our leaders who we're convinced are corrupt -- and we just have different opinions about who's corrupt and who is trying to lead us to a better world.<br /><br />My view? We're collectively responsible through our hearts and actions as to how we're governed, and we need to truly use 2021 to transform ourselves -- to better ourselves -- in order to root out corruption in government. In this way, regardless of who's right about where the problem lies in government, I believe it can be resolved.<br /><br />Of course personal transformation isn't overnight work, although 2020 produced a ton of pressure to drive change at a pace we've never seen. That can't help but to have opened new opportunities for us in 2021, and now we need to dream a better dream, to not continue focusing on what we think is wrong and who we can blame, but to dream the kind of world we'd like to see. We'd like to live in. We'd like our future generations to live in.<br /><br />If you eliminate corruption from all our institutions -- and this includes a lot of corrupt "science" based on agendas -- could we get a clear view on our environment, and economy, and health, and education? Can we see a way for these to harmonize and uplift one another rather than being in competition?<br /><br />Importantly, as we envision a new and better world -- and hold that vision as clearly as possible -- can we do something right now, today, that is critical to the world we want to build: can we stop thinking that people who see the world differently have evil intentions?<br /><br />Forget about the clearly corrupt who are trying to capture money and power for themselves. I'm speaking about the average person who clearly wants good things happening to themselves and their neighbors. Can we remember that? Can we trust that they actually don't want bad things happening? Can we set aside the drama of hate long enough to remember that we all generally want the same things, even if we have different beliefs about how to achieve that?<br /><br />If so, we can get back to civil conversations about our next steps and how we can indeed fulfill our vision for the best of what we all have in mind.</div>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[School Banned 2020]]></title><link><![CDATA[https://www.stevemccardell.com/blog/school-banned-2020]]></link><comments><![CDATA[https://www.stevemccardell.com/blog/school-banned-2020#comments]]></comments><pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2020 22:25:27 GMT</pubDate><category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.stevemccardell.com/blog/school-banned-2020</guid><description><![CDATA[ For band students who are passionate about music, getting together to play as an ensemble is the big redemption for school days. Sure, there may be other good teachers or subjects, but nothing lifts the soul like sitting in the midst of notes that soar into the heavens.For countless students in the spring of 2020, the whole band experience was, well ... banned. They were sent home to finish the year online, any hope of ensembles put to rest. So long band. So long musical. So long jazz band.As w [...] ]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<span class='imgPusher' style='float:right;height:0px'></span><span style='display: table;width:auto;position:relative;float:right;max-width:100%;;clear:right;margin-top:0px;*margin-top:0px'><a href='https://www.cafepress.com/meagerminds/17141697' target='_blank'><img src="https://www.stevemccardell.com/uploads/2/8/3/5/2835963/editor/school-banned-2020-small.jpg?1598740538" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 20px; margin-right: 0px; border-width:0; max-width:100%" alt="School Banned 2020" class="galleryImageBorder wsite-image" /></a><span style="display: table-caption; caption-side: bottom; font-size: 90%; margin-top: -0px; margin-bottom: 0px; text-align: center;" class="wsite-caption"></span></span> <div class="paragraph" style="text-align:left;display:block;">For band students who are passionate about music, getting together to play as an ensemble is the big redemption for school days. Sure, there may be other good teachers or subjects, but nothing lifts the soul like sitting in the midst of notes that soar into the heavens.<br /><br />For countless students in the spring of 2020, the whole band experience was, well ... banned. They were sent home to finish the year online, any hope of ensembles put to rest. So long band. So long musical. So long jazz band.<br /><br />As we head into the fall of 2020, many schools once again aren't getting together in person, including for my son in high school. And so, band has once again been banned, at least for the time.<br /><br />It's a unique disappointment that they share. And if we're going to be disappointed with something, the least we can do is have a laugh about it.<br /><br />So without further ado, I share my new <strong><a href="https://www.cafepress.com/meagerminds/17141697" target="_blank">"School Banned 2020" t-shirts</a></strong> and related products for band students who want to remember this and share a laugh about the memory as best they can.</div> <hr style="width:100%;clear:both;visibility:hidden;"></hr>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[2020: the Year for Seeing Clearly]]></title><link><![CDATA[https://www.stevemccardell.com/blog/2020-the-year-for-seeing-clearly]]></link><comments><![CDATA[https://www.stevemccardell.com/blog/2020-the-year-for-seeing-clearly#comments]]></comments><pubDate>Thu, 02 Jan 2020 01:26:42 GMT</pubDate><category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.stevemccardell.com/blog/2020-the-year-for-seeing-clearly</guid><description><![CDATA[We're finally here: the year 2020. No major efforts on flying cars yet. Although they might not be such a long way off, now that we know the Navy has a patent on anti-gravity technology.Of course in&nbsp;Darwood &amp; Smitty, we settle for cars that mostly just hover a few feet off the roadway using a magnetic system. (Flying on this system costs too much for the average commute.) That doesn't happen till 2030.But what DOES happen in 2020 is that the public finally becomes aware -- as a confirme [...] ]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="paragraph" style="text-align:left;">We're finally here: the year 2020. No major efforts on flying cars yet. Although they might not be such a long way off, now that we know <a href="https://metro.co.uk/2019/04/18/us-navy-secretly-designed-super-fast-futuristic-aircraft-resembling-ufo-documents-reveal-9246755/" target="_blank">the Navy has a patent on anti-gravity technology.</a><br /><br />Of course in&nbsp;<em>Darwood &amp; Smitty</em>, we settle for cars that mostly just hover a few feet off the roadway using a magnetic system. (Flying on this system costs too much for the average commute.) That doesn't happen till 2030.<br /><br />But what DOES happen in 2020 is that the public finally becomes aware -- as a confirmed point of common knowledge -- that aliens from throughout the solar system are here on Earth. As the book tells it:<br />&#8203;<br /></div>  <blockquote><font size="3">&#8203;<span style="color:rgb(51, 51, 51)">When the global government took form in 2020, life from the rest of the system made itself known. Considering the technology of Earth&rsquo;s planetary neighbors, you&rsquo;d think the smog problem wouldn&rsquo;t last. But there were precisely two problems standing in the way: the Martians, who had fits of laughter about us using oil, were mercenaries. All they liked to do was trade. And they had plenty of oil they wanted to get rid of. With our supplies starting to trickle, they were happy to feed the addiction.</span><br /><br /><span style="color:rgb(51, 51, 51)">But a little more grievously, the Venusians had tried presenting a magnetic grid solution for powering our vehicles. And they presented to the wrong politicians, who were in the wrong pockets and saw to it that such a thing wouldn&rsquo;t happen on their watch. It took a while for the Venusians to finally understand, but when they did, it was an easy answer: give the politicians more power than oil was giving them. Let New York raise funds from every car tapping into the magnetic grid. Then the oil cats couldn&rsquo;t pull their strings and &mdash; with so many funds available &mdash; New York could cut back on taxes, providing relief to the people, and&nbsp;</span><em style="color:rgb(51, 51, 51)">still</em><span style="color:rgb(51, 51, 51)">&nbsp;fund extra programs.</span><br /><br /><span style="color:rgb(51, 51, 51)">It was a nice idea. In fact, it was a&nbsp;</span><em style="color:rgb(51, 51, 51)">great</em><span style="color:rgb(51, 51, 51)">&nbsp;idea, and put in place by 2030. But of course the taxes weren&rsquo;t lowered. The government just reached its arms out further for a kind and smothering embrace.</span></font></blockquote>  <div class="paragraph" style="text-align:left;"><br />Of course this doesn't mean that this story is on the same timeline as ours. Everything <em>was</em> moving in the direction of global government for a while, but now we seem to be having a global backlash against it, so methinks we slipped away from their timeline, which leaves us to wonder: will we really learn publicly about alien life this year? 364 more days till we know for sure.<br /><br />&#8203;<strong>But it makes me wonder:</strong> if we finally did have hard, undeniable evidence of alien life here -- and I mean so obvious that you really could not deny it if you bothered to look -- but the media said there was no such thing ... would people continue to believe the media?<br /><br />I wonder this because it seems like there are&nbsp;<em>far easier things to believe than aliens</em>&nbsp;that people still refuse to see because their favorite media sources deny them. Even though they are practically undeniable for anyone taking a step back and looking dispassionately at things.<br /><br /><strong>2020, of course, isn't just the year we've entered. It's also in our consciousness as clear (20/20) vision,</strong> and I'd like to promote this as the year for clear vision. As a time when we can maybe step back from our biases and allow for other possibilities; allow for new information to come in and be considered. In my opinion, it's the only way to at least understand other people, which is necessary if we want to live and work together in harmony.<br /><br />In fact, once we really learn to perceive the world through our hearts rather than just our brains, I believe we come to see as clearly as possible. If that sounds just philosophical, keep in mind that the heart has neurons just like the brain; I consider both of them brains. But we're so used to tapping the one in our heads, it's entirely dominant as our way of thinking. But it doesn't have to be.<br /><br />If we use the brain in our head to step back and really observe things without emotion and come to understand those who are different, it also lets us begin to <strong>open ourselves to compassion ... what I would call a thinking process of the heart.</strong><br /><br />No one says we'll strengthen the heart to do our thinking overnight. But I deem it as the future of humans, and when we begin to see clearly by seeing from our hearts, then our actions will finally give meaning to the word "kind" in humankind.</div>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[Carlos Castaneda, Mud Shadows, and a Children's Book?]]></title><link><![CDATA[https://www.stevemccardell.com/blog/carlos-castaneda-mud-shadows-and-a-childrens-book]]></link><comments><![CDATA[https://www.stevemccardell.com/blog/carlos-castaneda-mud-shadows-and-a-childrens-book#comments]]></comments><pubDate>Sat, 27 Apr 2019 20:07:45 GMT</pubDate><category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.stevemccardell.com/blog/carlos-castaneda-mud-shadows-and-a-childrens-book</guid><description><![CDATA[In one of those lovely life coincidences, I looked up Carlos Castaneda today, because I recently published a "children's book" (more on those quote marks in a minute) on the shadows that come alive at night. And I found that today happens to mark the day of Castaneda's death (1998), which his books called "a warrior&rsquo;s most valuable teacher, counselor, and benefactor."One of the intriguing things&nbsp;Castaneda wrote about was the predators, or flyers, or mud shadows. A theme he wasn't the  [...] ]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="paragraph" style="text-align:left;">In one of those lovely life coincidences, I looked up Carlos Castaneda today, because I recently published a "children's book" (more on those quote marks in a minute) on the shadows that come alive at night. And I found that today happens to mark the day of Castaneda's death (1998), which his books called "<span style="color:rgb(85, 85, 85)">a warrior&rsquo;s most valuable teacher, counselor, and benefactor."<br /><br />One of the intriguing things&nbsp;</span><span style="color:rgb(51, 51, 51)">Castaneda wrote about was the predators, or flyers, or mud shadows. A theme he wasn't the first or last to write about, and closely resembling the Gnostic teachings of the Archons. And an overall topic that must have influenced me in 2017 when I wrote my lengthy poem, "The Shadows Come Alive at Night." One that I finally published as <strong><a href="https://amzn.to/2GO3FO8" target="_blank">a book on Amazon</a></strong> just the other day.</span></div>  <div><div class="wsite-image wsite-image-border-none " style="padding-top:20px;padding-bottom:20px;margin-left:0px;margin-right:0px;text-align:center"> <a href='https://amzn.to/2GO3FO8' target='_blank'> <img src="https://www.stevemccardell.com/uploads/2/8/3/5/2835963/shadows-2panel_orig.jpg" alt="Shadows Come Alive at Night" style="width:auto;max-width:100%" /> </a> <div style="display:block;font-size:90%"></div> </div></div>  <div class="paragraph" style="text-align:left;"><span style="color:rgb(51, 51, 51)">Beginning with the phrase&nbsp;</span><em style="color:rgb(51, 51, 51)">Dear little children</em><span style="color:rgb(51, 51, 51)">, it is decidedly&nbsp;<em>not</em>&nbsp;a book for very young children. Think more of how&nbsp;</span>Roald Dahl writes for both older kids and adults at the same time, including his frequent pokes at adults and conventional thinking, and you might get a better idea of it.<br /><br />That said, for ages 8 or 9 and up, I suspect it's the only book that playfully but honestly tackles the topic of mud shadows, Archons, or whatever you might like to call them. (I imagine any religion outside of atheism has a name for them.) And so, at last, a confirmation for kids whose parents bizarrely keeping telling them that there's nothing bumping around in the dark at night.<br /><br />At the moment just available on Kindle, the ebook tells you how to get an audio book version for free as well. Would love to have you give it a read and a listen and -- love it? -- to leave a review.&nbsp; :)<br />&#8203;<br /></div>  <div style="text-align:center;"><div style="height: 10px; overflow: hidden;"></div> <a class="wsite-button wsite-button-large wsite-button-normal" href="https://amzn.to/2GO3FO8" target="_blank"> <span class="wsite-button-inner">Buy It for Kindle / Kindle Apps</span> </a> <div style="height: 10px; overflow: hidden;"></div></div>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[How to Set Time on an Armitron 40/8089 Watch]]></title><link><![CDATA[https://www.stevemccardell.com/blog/how-to-set-time-on-an-armitron-408089-watch]]></link><comments><![CDATA[https://www.stevemccardell.com/blog/how-to-set-time-on-an-armitron-408089-watch#comments]]></comments><pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2019 17:11:35 GMT</pubDate><category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.stevemccardell.com/blog/how-to-set-time-on-an-armitron-408089-watch</guid><description><![CDATA[I posted this many years ago on Google+ and have gotten so many thank yous because this watch comes with no instructions and I couldn't find a solution online. So when we figured it out, I thought it would help others. Now with Google+ going away, I'm reposting the solution here:Here's the trick to setting time on an Armitron 40/8089 Watch:HOLD DOWN on the Reset button. (Makes you wonder why you didn't think of that, right?)Eventually the time will start to blink.Use the Mode button to switch be [...] ]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="paragraph" style="text-align:left;">I posted this many years ago on Google+ and have gotten so many thank yous because this watch comes with no instructions and I couldn't find a solution online. So when we figured it out, I thought it would help others. Now with Google+ going away, I'm reposting the solution here:<br /><br /><strong><span style="color:rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.87)">Here's the trick to setting time on an Armitron 40/8089 Watch:</span></strong><br /><br /><ul><li><span style="color:rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.87)">HOLD DOWN on the Reset button. (Makes you wonder why you didn't think of that, right?)</span></li><li><span style="color:rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.87)">Eventually the time will start to blink.</span></li><li><span style="color:rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.87)">Use the Mode button to switch between seconds, hours, and minutes.</span></li><li><span style="color:rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.87)">Use the ST/STP button to change the time.</span></li></ul></div>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[New Book: Life's Game Manual]]></title><link><![CDATA[https://www.stevemccardell.com/blog/new-book-lifes-game-manual]]></link><comments><![CDATA[https://www.stevemccardell.com/blog/new-book-lifes-game-manual#comments]]></comments><pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2018 15:33:45 GMT</pubDate><category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.stevemccardell.com/blog/new-book-lifes-game-manual</guid><description><![CDATA[My latest project is online at Amazon. And given that it probably provides all the answers you've been looking for about life on Earth ... it's the bargain of a lifetime. Apparently written by those who programmed this entire game for us, it's something that took me more than 20 years to find ... and now I've made it accessible for all. You're welcome.&nbsp; ;)With more details on the Amazon page or here on my site, I can briefly say that it covers the rules of the game, how we're programmed, an [...] ]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="paragraph" style="text-align:left;">My latest project is <a href="https://amzn.to/2YMkJwj" target="_blank">online at Amazon</a>. And given that it probably provides all the answers you've been looking for about life on Earth ... it's the bargain of a lifetime. Apparently written by those who programmed this entire game for us, it's something that took me more than 20 years to find ... and now I've made it accessible for all. You're welcome.&nbsp; ;)<br /><br />With more details on the Amazon page or <a href="https://www.stevemccardell.com/game-manual.html">here on my site</a>, I can briefly say that it covers the rules of the game, how we're programmed, and how to win. It also explains a lot you've probably always wondered about. At least if you're anything like me. (I know ... that's a stretch.)<br /><br />I mean did you ever wonder if some people, well ... aren't people the way you're thinking? Or whether reincarnation's really a thing? Or even why kids see freaky stuff and think there are monsters under the bed? If so, it's Game Manual time.<br /><br /><strong>It's a pretty quick read.</strong> In probably a couple hours, you'll understand life in a way that virtually no one else does. Oh ... did I say virtually? An unintended pun, I assure you.<br />&#8203;</div>  <div style="text-align:center;"><div style="height: 10px; overflow: hidden;"></div> <a class="wsite-button wsite-button-large wsite-button-normal" href="https://amzn.to/2YMkJwj" target="_blank"> <span class="wsite-button-inner">Buy on Amazon</span> </a> <div style="height: 10px; overflow: hidden;"></div></div>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[Arrr, I Have Updated My Piracy Policy]]></title><link><![CDATA[https://www.stevemccardell.com/blog/arrr-i-have-updated-my-piracy-policy]]></link><comments><![CDATA[https://www.stevemccardell.com/blog/arrr-i-have-updated-my-piracy-policy#comments]]></comments><pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2018 12:08:05 GMT</pubDate><category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.stevemccardell.com/blog/arrr-i-have-updated-my-piracy-policy</guid><description><![CDATA[Today may forever be known as GDPR day. You know, the day when new European legislation went into effect, which meant many of us got countless emails about updates to company Privacy Policies. In my case, I decided to create a new Piracy Policy as well. (Arrr, matey.) I think it's a lot more interesting than all the new Privacy Policies out there.The obvious intention of the legislation is to promote the privacy of individuals in an age of privacy invasion. But like so much legislation, there's  [...] ]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="paragraph" style="text-align:left;">Today may forever be known as GDPR day. You know, the day when new European legislation went into effect, which meant many of us got countless emails about updates to company Privacy Policies. In my case, I decided to create a new <a href="https://www.stevemccardell.com/piracy-policy.html">Piracy Policy</a> as well. (Arrr, matey.) I think it's a lot more interesting than all the new Privacy Policies out there.<br /><br />The obvious intention of the legislation is to promote the privacy of individuals in an age of privacy invasion. But like so much legislation, there's a lot to it that's incredibly vague, leaving room for interpretation, and therefore expensive legal battles and/or penalties against companies that are trying to do the right thing but didn't cross some T or dot some "i" in the way someone else thinks it should have been done.<br /><br />In other words, the opportunity for legislation to be used against people and companies. A fundraiser for governments that are running out of money, running out of ways to tax their people directly. So they'll tax them indirectly by taking money from companies those people do business with (forcing price increase), or by driving those companies out of Europe and lowering the people's standard of living (by reducing the companies they can do business with).<br /><br />Hopefully this legislation won't be used in sweeping ways to cause this kind of damage. But if the legal system has taught us anything ... well, we must keep our hope and stand against egregious use of these laws.</div>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[As Predicted, Aliens are Here]]></title><link><![CDATA[https://www.stevemccardell.com/blog/as-predicted-aliens-are-here]]></link><comments><![CDATA[https://www.stevemccardell.com/blog/as-predicted-aliens-are-here#comments]]></comments><pubDate>Tue, 26 Dec 2017 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.stevemccardell.com/blog/as-predicted-aliens-are-here</guid><description><![CDATA[Back in August, on the day of the big solar eclipse event, I talked about Darwood &amp; Smitty's&nbsp;prediction that we would all know about alien life in the solar system as a fact by sometime in 2020. That it wouldn't change much in the lives of everyday people, but that everyday people would know for sure: aliens are here.Now sure ... there is a UFO community that's believed in alien life for a long time and that feels we have plenty of evidence. But of course the topic has been largely poo- [...] ]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="paragraph" style="text-align:left;">Back in August, on the day of the big solar eclipse event, I talked about <em><a href="https://www.stevemccardell.com/darwood-smitty.html">Darwood &amp; Smitty's</a>&nbsp;</em>prediction that we would all know about alien life in the solar system as a fact by sometime in 2020. That it wouldn't change much in the lives of everyday people, but that everyday people would know for sure: <strong>aliens are here.</strong><br /><br />Now sure ... there is a UFO community that's believed in alien life for a long time and that feels we have plenty of evidence. But of course the topic has been largely poo-pooed and even ridiculed by mainstream thought.<br /><br />But it took less than 4 months from that post and the solar eclipse for everything to change. In case you missed it, the mainstream media rolled out its collective story beginning on December 16. The UFO topic is being discussed in all seriousness.<br /><br />For those who can't stand one of these news sources, I offer links to both "The New York Times" and Fox News:<br /><br /><a href="http://video.foxnews.com/v/5688855197001/?#sp=show-clips" target="_blank">http://video.foxnews.com/v/5688855197001/?#sp=show-clips</a><br /><br /><a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/16/us/politics/pentagon-program-ufo-harry-reid.html" target="_blank">https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/16/us/politics/pentagon-program-ufo-harry-reid.html</a><br /><br />For those who aren't fans of either news source ... I understand, and I'm sorry. But the articles and videos are still out there.<br /><br />A more <a href="http://www.newsweek.com/ufo-existence-proven-beyond-reasonable-doubt-says-former-head-pentagon-alien-758293" target="_blank">recent Newsweek article</a> even quotes the head of the Pentagon program that was analyzing UFOs.&nbsp;<span style="color:rgb(60, 60, 60)">"'I hate to use the term&nbsp;</span><em style="color:rgb(60, 60, 60)">UFO</em><span style="color:rgb(60, 60, 60)">&nbsp;but that's what we're looking at,' he added. 'I think it's pretty clear this is not us, and it's not anyone else, so no one has to ask questions where they're from.'"</span><br />&#8203;</div>  <div><div class="wsite-image wsite-image-border-none " style="padding-top:0px;padding-bottom:0px;margin-left:0px;margin-right:0px;text-align:center"> <a> <img src="https://www.stevemccardell.com/uploads/2/8/3/5/2835963/ufo_orig.jpg" alt="UFO" style="width:auto;max-width:100%" /> </a> <div style="display:block;font-size:90%"></div> </div></div>  <div class="paragraph" style="text-align:left;"><br /><span style="color:rgb(51, 51, 51)">&#8203;But wait ... does this really mean we're acknowledging ET life around our planet now as absolute fact?</span><br /><br /><span style="color:rgb(51, 51, 51)">Nope. In fact, I've seen some interesting commentary that the video the above articles are based on is bogus, based on considerations like: there wouldn't be any outside wind noise from outside the jet because the microphone is inside a helmet; and the lingo isn't at all how trained pilots would be communicating.</span><br /><br />Be that as it may, there's an interesting aside here: the Raytheon corporation <a href="https://www.raytheon.com/news/feature/uap_atflir.html" target="_blank">references this story</a>, saying that their technology was used to track this UFO.<br />&#8203;</div>  <div><div class="wsite-image wsite-image-border-none " style="padding-top:10px;padding-bottom:10px;margin-left:0px;margin-right:0px;text-align:center"> <a> <img src="https://www.stevemccardell.com/uploads/2/8/3/5/2835963/raytheon-ufo_orig.jpg" alt="Raytheon Technology Tracks a UFO" style="width:auto;max-width:100%" /> </a> <div style="display:block;font-size:90%"></div> </div></div>  <div class="paragraph" style="text-align:left;"><br /><span style="color:rgb(51, 51, 51)">Regardless of whether this video is legit,&nbsp;</span><span style="color:rgb(51, 51, 51)"><strong>what this media coverage does mean is my favorite thing of all:</strong>&nbsp;we can start to speak more openly about what has been a ridiculed topic. And to me, that's the only time when we can progress and learn things. Ridicule comes either from closed minds or from special interests trying to drive an agenda, and either way it slows a true, scientific investigation of things.<br /><br />By scientific, I mean an attitude that is open to any and all possibilities, and that will seek to explore them by gathering information with as little bias as possible. Yes, science will tend to interpret what it finds based on what it already knows (because every human does this), and sometimes this leads to mistaken interpretations because there's plenty we don't know. To me, that's ok.<br /><br />What's not ok is when we're kept from the right interpretations because of agendas that favor the few. That's why I'm interested in the opening of this new conversation.<br /><br />Of course if Smitty saw this happening, he'd immediately be suspicious: what's the media's agenda? Why are they opening this up for discussion now? What narrative will they collectively push, and to what end?</span><br /><br /><span style="color:rgb(51, 51, 51)">But in the best of circumstances, there's no conspiracy here. There's just a new conversation we can have. And that gives us up to three years to have this conversation before 2020 ends. Three years before, as D&amp;S explains, we'll know for sure that they're here.</span></div>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[Most of Twitter is Wrong about Ivanka Trump and Otherwise]]></title><link><![CDATA[https://www.stevemccardell.com/blog/most-of-twitter-is-wrong-about-ivanka-trump-and-otherwise]]></link><comments><![CDATA[https://www.stevemccardell.com/blog/most-of-twitter-is-wrong-about-ivanka-trump-and-otherwise#comments]]></comments><pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2017 22:34:10 GMT</pubDate><category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.stevemccardell.com/blog/most-of-twitter-is-wrong-about-ivanka-trump-and-otherwise</guid><description><![CDATA[It's amazing and sad how small so many humans have become. I know, maybe it's just the internet giving us the distance to not be very human with one another. Or maybe this is how many people are face to face. (Thank heavens not in the circle of people I interact with except when it's in good fun.)In this case, I'm referring to Twitter's reaction to Ivanka Trump's use of the word "otherwise." So if you haven't seen it yet, here you go:&#8203;         So Twitter is a storm of laughter and taunting [...] ]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="paragraph" style="text-align:left;">It's amazing and sad how small so many humans have become. I know, maybe it's just the internet giving us the distance to not be very human with one another. Or maybe this is how many people are face to face. (Thank heavens not in the circle of people I interact with except when it's in good fun.)<br /><br />In this case, I'm referring to Twitter's reaction to Ivanka Trump's use of the word "otherwise." So if you haven't seen it yet, here you go:<br />&#8203;</div>  <div><div class="wsite-image wsite-image-border-none " style="padding-top:10px;padding-bottom:10px;margin-left:0;margin-right:0;text-align:center"> <a> <img src="https://www.stevemccardell.com/uploads/2/8/3/5/2835963/ivankatrump-otherwise_orig.jpg" alt="Picture" style="width:auto;max-width:100%" /> </a> <div style="display:block;font-size:90%"></div> </div></div>  <div class="paragraph" style="text-align:left;"><br />So Twitter is a storm of laughter and taunting about her incorrect use of the word "otherwise." Never mind that, scanning through their comments, I can immediately start seeing their own errors in grammar and punctuation. And after scanning one person's Twitter feed, I couldn't do much more than sigh and think, "Wow, this is just this person's life, filled with hate. At least on Twitter."<br /><br /><strong>But for all the laughter and taunting ... they are wrong.</strong><br /><br />Not&nbsp;<em>all</em>&nbsp;of them, but&nbsp;<em>most&nbsp;</em>of them. One person's comment was perhaps correct: most of us would probably agree it's an awkward way to use the word, and probably she meant to use the word "overall" or something like that. "Cuddling my little nephew Luke ... the best part of an overall incredible day!"<br /><br />But the taunting comes from the interpretation that she is saying she did&nbsp;<em>not</em>&nbsp;like cuddling her nephew. To the people who are laughing because they think that's what she's saying ... sorry, but the laugh's on you.<br /><br />"... otherwise incredible day" definitely means that cuddling with Luke was&nbsp;<em>not</em>&nbsp;incredible. That it was something else. That's what "otherwise" means. No argument there.<br /><br />But it's also clear that she said cuddling with him was the&nbsp;<em>best part</em>&nbsp;of an incredible day.<br /><br />So if the best part of an incredible day is something other than incredible, it simply means that cuddling Luke was&nbsp;<em><strong>better than incredible.</strong></em><br /><br />Again,&nbsp;"best part" is certainly better than another part, and "otherwise" certainly means it wasn't incredible. So by definition, "better than incredible." I think that's a pretty good compliment to young Luke.<br /><br />Now seriously, some of us are excellent with math, others with writing, others with science or history. Some of us know how to show compassion. Some of us are great parents. Some of us build incredible things with our hands, others do so with their minds. We all have our strengths and we all have our weaknesses.<br /><br />Can you imagine where things are going if we all use our strengths to batter those who are weak in those areas ... and meanwhile we can expect to get beat up on our own worse challenges? Sounds to me like any sane person's nightmare. And yet that's what this kind of hatred and spewing leads us toward.<br /><br />I think we can be better than that, and I pray that we will be. I prefer using my strengths to help those who need my help. And I prefer being able to ask for help where I need it.</div>]]></content:encoded></item></channel></rss>